The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public. To what extent do you agree?
Universe is always a very mysterious thing to human. Although science and technology have highly developed, whether or not there is life on other planets is still a big question. While the government is using lots of funds to discover this, some people opine that instead of wasting money on this project, the government should spend more money addressing the problems of public. Personally, I believe that both discovering life on other planets and solving public matters are significant.
In the first place, space research brings people plentiful benefits in the long run. People can enrich their knowledge and curiosity about other life forms. In addition, by researching planets, scientists are capable of working out key for overpopulation problem. For instance, after discovering Mars as well as its condition, maybe, in the near future, human will settle in this planet and living on Mars might be no longer a science-fiction story. Furthermore, the more people know about the universe, the better they understand themselves. Seeing the harsh weather of other planets which can not allow anybody to live, people will appreciate their lives on the Earth. Therefore, they will together protect the big home.
On the other hand, human are facing many difficult problems on the Earth. Famine, social evils and natural disasters occur with increasing frequency and need tackling thoroughly. That is why people opine that government should spend money addressing these problems first in lieu of paying attention to space research. Moreover, illiteracy is considered as the biggest enemy of people all around the world. Thus, it seems to be very wasteful to invest capital in space projects while people are struggling with illiteracy to improve their qualifications.
To sum up, the government ought to consider what they should do so that both discovering life on planets and tackling problems on the Earth are arranged reasonably.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...e and technology have highly developed, whether or not there is life on other planets is still...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, to sum up, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 5.60731707317 339% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 965.302439024 171% => OK
No of words: 308.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35064935065 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76168762463 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 106.607317073 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 283.868780488 175% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3611103233 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9411764706 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362231008684 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946835603739 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132030807236 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223475128792 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120757320365 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 40.7170731707 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.