The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013
The table illustrates the total family income as well as particular expenditure on food and clothes per household in a UK city in 2010 and 2013. The pie chart describes proportion of 5 different categories to show the detail of spending on food and clothes.
Overall, there was a significant fall in the total household income in 2013, whereas spending on food and clothes rose slightly. In detail, the percentage of expenditure on fruits and vegetables was the highest increased category in 2013.
The total income decreased dramatically from 29,000£ in 2010 to 25,000£ in 2013. Despite the decline in total income, there was a slightly increase in the expenditure on food and clothes, from 14,000£ in 2010 to 15,000£ in 2013.
For specific, people spent more on fruits and vegetables in 2013 than in 2010 , from 20% to 35% of total income. In the same trend, spending on dairy products rose marginally from 15% to 20%. Meanwhile, the percentage of spending on clothes as well as meat and fish fell rapidly in 2013, 12% and 15% respectively. The rate of other food and drinks remained at 18% in both 2010 and 2013.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...l income decreased dramatically from 29,000£ in 2010 to 25,000£ in 2013. Despite the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...dramatically from 29,000£ in 2010 to 25,000£ in 2013. Despite the decline in total i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... the decline in total income, there was a slightly increase in the expenditure on food and clothes,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...xpenditure on food and clothes, from 14,000£ in 2010 to 15,000£ in 2013. For spec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '£000'.
Suggestion: £000
...and clothes, from 14,000£ in 2010 to 15,000£ in 2013. For specific, people spent ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uits and vegetables in 2013 than in 2010 , from 20% to 35% of total income. In the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85492227979 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74858295455 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497409326425 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2549005146 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313289087041 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134500176627 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911027989013 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214450843028 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945029595584 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.