The information below give details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The charts illustrate how much money a family could earn and spend on food and clothes in one city in the UK between 2010 and 2013.
As can be seen from the charts, while the total financial income of the household decreased in the surveyed period, the expenditure for food and clothes increased. Moreover, the highest percentage of spending was on meat and fish in 2010 and on fruits and vegetables in 2013.
In particular, the total amount of household earnings dropped by 4,000 pounds, from 29,000 pounds in 2010 to 25,000 pounds in 2013. In contrast, there was a marginal growth in the figures for spending, from 14,000 pounds to 15,000 pounds.
Furthermore, the money spent on meat and fish made up a quarter of the expenditure in 2010, followed by 22% from clothes and 20% from fruits and vegetables. However, people spent more on this category in 2013, at 35% of their spending, while the money for the first two sectors experienced a fall of 10% each. Meanwhile, the figure of dairy goods increased merely by 5% to a fifth in 2013, which was 2% higher than that of other food and beverages.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- In some countries an increasing number of people suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with thi 56
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 67
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, while, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52568137414 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.2483765549 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226246873743 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102793687277 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101355109532 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166039097273 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116897597786 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.