international visitors to New Zealand: transport used during the visit
The chart gives information about international visitors used transportation to visit in New Zealand. It shows how many percents of the tourist used transportation in New Zealand two different transportation tourist used private transport and public transport.
To begin tourist used private transport of car increasing sharply to 69% this is the biggest percentage during a visit to New Zealand than other transport.
On the other hand, The contribute to public transport was only the lowest until the last period from the chart. And then coach and plane of public transport have the same percentage only 30% during the visit, while train and boat of public transport have the different percentage for train only 20% and boat only 8% so visitor used public transport always fluctuated during the visit in New Zealand.
Overall the five transport had a fluctuation on the percentage of visitor used transportation in New Zealand. However, it is prominent from the given that chart is the car.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han other transport. On the other hand, The contribute to public transport was o...
^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n other transport. On the other hand, The contribute to public transport was only the lowest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... transport have the same percentage only 30% during the visit, while train and bo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18633540373 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90685884152 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490683229814 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4001150608 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.585043222052 0.215688989381 271% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.309293746143 0.103423049105 299% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.19731104383 0.0843802449381 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.40090870773 0.15604864568 257% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102749021355 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.