Task 1: The table details the international tourist arrivals (in millions) in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes (in percentages). Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows statistics about the number of international travelers in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the shifts in this period.
Overall, France was the most popular country among international tourists and Hong Kong was the least in 2009 and 2010. In addition, the most significant rise in popularity was shown in Germany and the only country which witnessed a fall in the figure was Hong Kong.
It is substantial that 76 million international tourist arrivals were recorded in 2009 and that remain the same in 2010. With 66 million and the rise of 1.5%, the US ranked second in both two years. In 2009, Spain and UK shared the same number of international tourist arrivals, 55 million but the percentage of rise in the latter was approximately twice as much as the former. Moreover, the number of Turkey started with 33 million, which was 11 million lower than that of Italy before demonstrating a sharp increase of 33% and finishing with 45 million, equivalent to Italy.
The international arrivals to Germany doubled from 11 million to 23 million in the examined period. The figure for China in 2009 was roughly twice as much as Hong Kong. However, in 2010, China showed an increase of 55 percent whereas a decrease of 11 percent was recorded in Hong Kong.
- Task 1 The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 1 The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Task 1 The plans below show a bookstore in 2000 and the bookstore now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Task 1 The diagram below shows the process of growing and preparing pineapples and pineapple products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Task 2 If old people are no longer physically mentally or financially able to look after themselves younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79090909091 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72008142805 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504545454545 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7458384862 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212844755202 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102180487148 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707362736564 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139219546166 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406247025872 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.