the line chart
The line chart illustrates how much output wasted by three different companies between 2000 and 2015.
It is obvious that while the amount of waste produced by company C increased significantly, the opposite was true for company A and company B. It also noticeable that the figure for waste output by company A was largest for most of the period.
In 2000, there was nearly 12 tones of waste from company A, compared with around 8 tones and 4 tones each on company B and company C. over the next 5 years, a slight decrease of 8 tone in the amount of waste produced by company A, by contrast, waste production of company B and company C rose slowly to 10 tone and 6 tone.
From the year 2005 on ward, company C’s waste output went up sharply to reached a peak of 10 tone in 2015 while the amount of waste produced by company B dropped sharply to just 3 tone at the end of the period. During the same period was a slow decline in the figure for waste material respectively from company A.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-05 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | khanhkhanhlhp | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | khanhkhanhlhp | 84 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | Vicky_2702 | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | dorae | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39247311828 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4388047335 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2093905791 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0454097029183 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414744281943 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10159118645 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725802493401 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125712679483 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.