The line charts compare how much time it would take for three companies to manufacture a car from 200 to 2012.
The line graph shows the number of hours taken to produce a car by three companies throughout the period from 2000 to 2012.
Overall, the amount of time spent on the production of a car increased in three groups between 2000 to 2012. There was a wide fluctuation in the time to make a car from Ford over the period.
In 2000, Ford took 28 hours to produce a vehicle, before suffering from a decreased sharply to nearly 10 hours in 2004. However, Ford became the firm with the lowest working efficiency at the end of the period, needing almost 40 hours for producing a car by 2012.
By contrast, Toyota was the company need the least time to manufacture a vehicle, with under 20 hours in 2000. This figure was witnessed a slight rise to above 20 hours after 4 years. In 2012, there was reached the bottom to about 18 hours for Toyota to make a car. The figure for Honda to produce a vehicle increased from over 30 hours to close 40 in the first six years of the period, prior to reducing to nearly 35 at the end of the period.
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that telling the truth is not always essential It is necessary to tell lies sometimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.28717948718 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27605666121 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4360020076 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217488269876 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107880434447 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699961659103 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165886094643 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643542644362 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.