The line charts compare how much time it would take for three companies to manufacture a car from 200 to 2012.
The line graph shows the number of hours taken to produce a car by three companies throughout the period from 2000 to 2012.
Overall, the amount of time spent on the production of a car increased in three groups between 2000 to 2012. There was a wide fluctuation in the time to make a car from Ford over the period.
In 2000, Ford took 28 hours to produce a vehicle, before suffering from a decreased sharply to nearly 10 hours in 2004. However, Ford became the firm with the lowest working efficiency at the end of the period, needing almost 40 hours for producing a car by 2012.
By contrast, Toyota was the company need the least time to manufacture a vehicle, with under 20 hours in 2000. This figure was witnessed a slight rise to above 20 hours after 4 years. In 2012, there was reached the bottom to about 18 hours for Toyota to make a car. The figure for Honda to produce a vehicle increased from over 30 hours to close 40 in the first six years of the period, prior to reducing to nearly 35 at the end of the period.
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease violent crimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
- The line charts compare how much time it would take for three companies to manufacture a car from 2000 to 2012. 61
- Some people think that telling the truth is not always essential It is necessary to tell lies sometimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The line charts compare how much time it would take for three companies to manufacture a car from 200 to 2012. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.28717948718 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27605666121 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4360020076 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217488269876 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107880434447 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699961659103 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165886094643 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643542644362 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.