The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the different age of cinema attendance in the UK.
Overall, it is clear that the age group of people who going to the cinema was in raising trend from 1990 to 2010, while there were some fluctuation in this period. However, the cinema attendance who was between 24 age and 34 age showed a stable tendency.
The aged between 45 and 54 was the most important cinema attendance in the UK, which accounted for 37% in 1990, which followed closely by the aged from 34 to 44 (36%). The other aged group just accounted for 23% and 15%. However, all the age group showed the declined trend between 1995 and 2000, while the ranking never changed.
After 2000, all the age group of cinema attendance in the UK in the increase trend. The aged between 44 and 54 was in the shapely increased, which reached the plateau, accounting for 51%. However, the other age groups, such as the aged from 34 to 44 and the aged between 14 and 24 was in the same inclined trend, which the aged of 24 to 34 was remained steady from 2005 to 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 67
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or taeching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4175257732 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25724350975 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469072164948 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4199932741 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0701119551477 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525643115414 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640436011826 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817198508854 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653131345881 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.