The graph illustrates changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. According to the information, the consumption of hamburgers and pizza increased drastically whereas Fish and Chips decreased.
In 1975, Consumption of Fish and Chips which reached a peak at about 100 times were eaten per year while Pizza and Hamburgers were consumed 5;10 respectively. Nevertheless, this situation changed gradually over the next 25 years. The proportion of consumption of Hamburger rose sharply from 5 times in 1975 to 100 times in 1995 and remained this ratio up to 2000. Pizza went up to the highest top at 85 times per year and overtook the consumption of Fish and chips which fell down consistently and finished at under 40 times per year.
Clearly consumption of fast food changed over the period 1975 to 2000
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 67
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980- 2010 56
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 78
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred. Write at least 150 words 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k at about 100 times were eaten per year while Pizza and Hamburgers were consumed...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... years. The proportion of consumption of Hamburger rose sharply from 5 times in 1...
^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the highest top at 85 times per year and overtook the consumption of Fish and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 662.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94029850746 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88708572415 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559701492537 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 186.3 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7407061912 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212725921965 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158988287013 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.270154731219 0.0843802449381 320% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27150949152 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202821214978 0.0819641961636 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.