The given graph illustrates the fast food consumption of teenagers in Australia in terms of three different types over a course of 25 years starting from 1975.
As can be seen from the graph, it is clearly evident that the amounts of pizza and hamburgers consumed witnessed an upward trend, while it was the opposite for fish and chips consumption during the period shown. At first, the figure for fish and chips was the largest; however, hamburgers became the most popular fast food at the end of the period.
Starting from 10 times eaten, the amount of hamburgers consumed rose exponentially to over 80 times in the next 10 years. A similar trend was witnessed in that of pizza, where it went up noticeably from only around 5 times to some 30 times eaten. On the other hand, the popularity of fish and chips slightly went down from 100 times to around 95 times eaten.
Over the next 10 years, the amounts of pizza and hamburgers eaten experienced a dramatical climb, followed by a stability at around 85 and 100 times eaten for the rest of the period. By contrast, that of fish and chips dived by over 60 times eaten, where it hit the lowest level in the last year.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 114, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...pizza and hamburgers consumed witnessed a upward trend, while it was the opposite...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56937799043 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44171075693 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521531100478 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0183773863 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127996779207 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659753120676 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532136951116 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956540898075 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060551441097 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.