The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
The depicted graph illustrates the amount of fast food consumed by Australian juvenile from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that the two kinds of food, namely hamburgers and pizza experienced upward trends while fish and chips showed a reversed pattern.
As can be seen, fish and chips took the highest figure among all kinds of fast food with 100 times in 1975 before this number declined moderately to roughly 85 in 1980. After that, it sharply fell to under 40 times in 2000 after a steady rise in 1985.
In contrast, there is a rapid rise in the number of times eaten of hamburgers to approximately 85 in 1985 from the starting point of nearly 10 in 1975, then this figure gradually increased to 100 in 1995 and remained unchanged in the following five years. Similarly, pizza witnessed a rapid growth to approximately 85 in 1995, prior to a flat with 100.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | asdasdasd | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Ashley Cheung | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | iamkristinjoi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime. Discuss both views and give yr opinion 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- These days, an increasing number of people in many cities know little about their neighbors and do not have a sense of community. What do you think are the causes and what solutions can you suggest? 78
- The table illustrates the number of people going to different tourist attractions in Australia during the four-year period from 1996. 78
- Task 1 Writing - The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over the last year 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6835443038 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5133516245 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.606114526 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226924836251 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129504393145 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173029831938 0.0843802449381 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183023981609 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190106537674 0.0819641961636 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.