The given line graph depicts food consumption trends of five different food items (vegetables, fruit, meat, bread and seafood) in Australia over a time span of 60 years from the year 1950 to 2010. Units are measured in Kg per person per year.
Overall, it can be inferred clearly that vegetables were the most liked food item throughout the given time period as opposed to seafood which was the least preferred among Australian residents. Moreover, all four items except seafood experienced a rise and fall in their demands which relatively remained constant.
Food items such as Vegetables and fruit noticed similar trends from the year 2000 to 2010 in which they noticed a steady increase in consumption rates .
Vegetables rose from 140 to 160 kilograms per person and Fruits from 120 to 140.
Going forward, the same two categories noticed a steady decline from the year 1960 to 1970 which was contrasted by meat bread and seafood gaining their consumption rates in the same year. Bread's demand rose sharply which was then followed by meat . Seafood rose marginally from around 19 kilograms to 20 kilograms and noticed the least fluctuation when compared to other items.
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 78
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
- The graph below show the percentage of men and woman aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d a steady increase in consumption rates . Vegetables rose from 140 to 160 kilogr...
^^
Line 8, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... sharply which was then followed by meat . Seafood rose marginally from around 19 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05641025641 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50496170774 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4088318902 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111054849497 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463468926125 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528246814455 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707420674383 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425036397598 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.