The provided chart illustrates the bifurcation of landlines and mobile phone's customer in percentage among various 7 countries.
Comprehensively, the total landlines users in US, Canada and Denmark are higher than the total cell phone users. On the contrary, in Germany, UK, Italy and Sweden we observe a reverse trend where the cellular telephone buyers are higher than landline buyers.
In Italy, Sweden and UK cell phone usage is popular by minimum 80% and beyond whereas the percentage of land phone users in each country vary with almost 60% to under 70% to below 50% each respectively.
The statistics also shows that Italy has the maximum statistical figure of phone users with 90% whereas Denmark marks the highest land phone users among rest of the countries by almost 90%.
Countries like Canada, US share a similar trend of exceeding the land phone percent over cell phone . Although cellular telephone consumers are under 70% in both the countries, Canada marks telephone line users under 40%
and USA below 50% each depicting a significant gap between its utilization. Germany on the other hand shows variance in this trend and provides us with considerable drop by 20% among the two categories. Landline is popularly used in the country by 60% and cell by 70% each.
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 78
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'phones'' or 'phone's'?
Suggestion: phones'; phone's
...the bifurcation of landlines and mobile phones customer in percentage among various 7 ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries. Comprehensively, the total landlines users in US, Canada and Denmar...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igher than landline buyers. In Italy, Sweden and UK cell phone usage is popul...
^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...line buyers. In Italy, Sweden and UK cell phone usage is popular by minimum 8...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...um 80% and beyond whereas the percentage of land phone users in each country vary...
^^
Line 6, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs among rest of the countries by almost 90%. Countries like Canada, US share ...
^^
Line 8, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the land phone percent over cell phone . Although cellular telephone consumers ...
^^
Line 8, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the land phone percent over cell phone . Although cellular telephone consumers a...
^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... telephone line users under 40% and USA below 50% each depicting a significant g...
^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arly used in the country by 60% and cell by 70% each.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08490566038 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6545715254 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561320754717 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6653943835 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.777777778 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140321133087 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692569390016 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435457168115 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826753425675 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341003945175 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.