Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The only constant factor in life is change. Few people believe that working in the same organization for a long time is beneficial in contrast to people who believe that change should be consistent and it is productive to work in different organizations. Changing or not changing organization is a subjective idea. However, in my opinion, working on different platforms is always a cherry on the cake for a better career. We shall reason this out with the few examples below.

On one hand, people working longer for the same firm can be beneficial to their career growth in later years but the fear of taking risk to step out of their comfort zone can also be one of the key factors. People working in government sectors are generally considered to have a long enduring careers in the same field since their time of start. Same can be considered for people working in private sectors for good amount of time period. However, this path can led them to a top management positions which they always desired for. For instance, Sundar Pichai is now the CEO of google after having an exponential growth in the same company for long, same is the case with Paras Agarwal the current CEO of twitter. Giving their excellent contribution to the company these people have excelled the world .However, the percentages of such successful stories are very low nearly around 1% . The masses are settled with the idea of not stepping out of their shell. Due to which they reach a stagnant position in their life.

On the other hand, networking, knowledge, and social factors affect the goals of an individual. In this fast technological era, where knowledge is available on all platforms the networking and social areas hit the points for an enriching career which could be achieved if an individual works for different organizations. It not only helps in their pathway but also comes with (material considerations)monetary benefits. The exposure to take risks and getting accustomed to new ideas is where real success lies in. For instance, APJ Abdul Kalam who used to sell newspapers initially to contribute to family finances and tried his luck in becoming a fighter pilot and later joined DRDO. Looking at this pathway unless we try and step out of the zone we won't be able to achieve the place which is meant for us. Similarly, Narayana Murthy who used to work in Patni Computer systems for five years after his first failed venture led him to be one of the successful business tycoon of an IT field.

In conclusion, risks shape the career perspectives and teach life lessons. To achieve a leadership level venturing out is one of the most important factors. However in this population growth staying in one organization might affect the desire for the goals and could be more readily achievable if an individual shapes his or her own career rather than waiting for an organization to do so.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-09 Ja Han 56 view
2021-12-31 nishchayvaid93 87 view
2021-07-25 tanmeet 56 view
2021-06-02 Tristy 56 view
2021-05-04 parmii 67 view
Essays by user nishchayvaid93 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... later years but the fear of taking risk to step out of their comfort zone can al...
^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'career'?
Suggestion: career
...ally considered to have a long enduring careers in the same field since their time of s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...any these people have excelled the world .However, the percentages of such success...
^^
Line 3, column 805, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...y these people have excelled the world .However, the percentages of such successful sto...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 886, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ul stories are very low nearly around 1% . The masses are settled with the idea of...
^^
Line 5, column 718, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...DRDO. Looking at this pathway unless we try and step out of the zone we wont be able to...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 978, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...ne of the successful business tycoon of an IT field. In conclusion, risks shape th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 984, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...the successful business tycoon of an IT field. In conclusion, risks shape the care...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... shape the career perspectives and teach life lessons. To achieve a leadership le...
^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lessons. To achieve a leadership level venturing out is one of the most importa...
^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...t is one of the most important factors. However in this population growth staying in on...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, similarly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2393.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 495.0 315.596192385 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83434343434 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74097987973 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517171717172 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 753.3 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7213792249 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.043478261 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17391304348 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299576290886 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829753834071 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789975765277 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184324077341 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806280400281 0.056905535591 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.