Foreign language
To begin learning a foreign language at primary school is supposed to be superior to starting at secondary school by several experts. In my opinion, while this idea has had several disadvantages, the advantages should be paid more attention by society.
The first drawback of teaching foreign language in primary school is that it possibly causes stress to children. Indeed, children are assigned to learn and achieve high scores in multiple subjects, which they may have no capacity to tackle. In addition, when youngsters are learning two languages at the same period, they are likely to be confused. For instance, numerous students, who take part in both their mother language class and a foreign one, have used English words in their traditional language writings at the beginning of primary school.
However, after making a considerable effort practicing a foreign language at young ages, the benefits can be easily noticed. Firstly, learning a second language or the third one such as English can make an enormous contribution to the success of youngsters in the future. In fact, once compared with their peers, who have not learnt English at young ages, children who have learnt English early have competitive advantages. For instance, although a few of students passed the university entrance exam, the majority of them failed since they studied English much later than the others.
Moreover, it may be simpler for a person to learn an unfamiliar language when he or she is a child. Obviously, a youngster may be able to comprehend more effectively than adults. For instance, the majority of primary students, who receive international education, are able to pronounce perfectly a fresh English word, whereas multiple senior students, who study in traditional schools, face many difficulties in learning English.
In conclusion, the advantages of this idea outweigh the disadvantages which are likely to be overcome by hard-work and determination. Thus, children are recommended learning a foreign language at primary schools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-18 | trần ngọc tuấn | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-23 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Tường Vân | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Tường Vân | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36335403727 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90136084573 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552795031056 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.232395261 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.133333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280031664803 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119015144997 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130546411633 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18102408642 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904256025158 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.