The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
The given pie charts detail the information related to donations collected and invested by a charity organization located in the USA over a period of one year.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the highest share of received money was spent on various investment areas. While the majority of donations fell under the category of food items, most of the expenditure went towards the program services.
According to the given illustration, food items constituted more than four-fifths of the total income, followed next by the community who contributed nearly one out of ten parts. In addition, whilst 2.2% of the total revenue came from various programs, other sources accounted for nearly 0.4%, and merely half of that was made up from investment and government grants.
Turning to the total spendings, exactly $53, 224, 896 was dedicated to all the services. Out of this, the program services made up the major share of 95.8%. On the contrary, only a small portion went for fundraising and management programs, as the former accounted for 2.6% as opposed to the latter which fell short by nearly 1%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | Wulan | 11 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 11 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | celine ayoub | 78 | view |
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- The diagram explains the production of chocolate 11
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72619250915 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625668449198 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2249924196 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142813789762 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580336976123 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103667702004 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104335993457 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123794830788 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72619250915 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625668449198 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2249924196 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142813789762 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580336976123 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103667702004 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104335993457 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123794830788 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.