The given graph illustrates the changes in consumption of food in Australia from 1950 to 2010.
Overall, more people consumed organic food than animal-based food throughout the period. In addition, vegetables were the most consumed while not many people eat seafood.
Initially, people ate vegetables the most, at more than 140 kg per person per year, meat and fruit counterparts were significantly lower, at about 109 kg and 80 kg, respectively. From 1950 to 1990, the amount of vegetables, fruit and meat consumed fluctuated wildly, then became nearly the same in 1990, at about 115 kg. The figure for green food then witnessed a noticeable climb, reached the peak at 160kg for vegetables, while the meat decreased sharply.
The bread and seafood were less consumed than the others. The consumption of bread started at 40kg per person per year, then experienced a remarkable growth in 1970. Then, the figure for bread declined gradually before a rebound was observed in 2010. Meanwhile, seafood consumption stabilized at 20kg per person per year throughout the period.
- The line graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The line graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- The map below shows the development of the town of Stromer between 1995 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- The line graph below shows food consumption in Australia between 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The pie charts below show exports between the US and Vietnam Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ood were less consumed than the others. The consumption of bread started at 40kg pe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20809248555 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79222463762 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554913294798 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8874608078 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0893093810173 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490431222169 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785185826024 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964907402208 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104792709871 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.