The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from.
The line chart, combined with the table, provides an overview of the number of overseas visitors, from six different countries, traveling to Australia annually from 1975 to 2005.
It is clear that there was a massive increase in the number of overseas tourists visiting Australia over a period of 30 years. According to the table, Japanese visitors contributed by far the largest number of tourists throughout the surveyed period.
In 1975, Australia recorded only 10 million overseas tourists coming to their country. However, this figure gradually rose over the 30-year period, peaking at approximately 20 million people in 2005. Noticeably, the number of overseas tourists saw an increase of 5 million people each decade, except for the second decade, which recorded the tourist figure rose by 10 million people.
With regard to the table given, the total number of tourists worldwide in 2005 was 30.4 million people, which was roughly triple that number in 1975. The number of tourists from Japan accounted for almost half of the total figure, with 12 million people in 2005. Korean visitors contributed to 2.9 and 9.1 million people in 1975 and 2005 respectively. These figures were well over twice as high as those for China, the US, Britain as well as other European countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | pritam | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | krunalptl29 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | abhushek_saha | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | ravitejacts | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | ravitejacts | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from. 73
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 89
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.) 78
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, well, as to, except for, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54829096613 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6758583151 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143872693965 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067489192713 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548030277801 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111034282223 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538011062665 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.