Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The urgency of environmental protection has truly hit home over the past few decades since we saw a number of pictures as to marine pollution or “Amazon desert”. The issue of whether individuals are not able to contribute to saving the earth, along with governments and large corporations, remains a subject of intense debate. In my opinion, I disagree with the idea mentioned above.
There are three main reasons why it takes all of the community to tango when it comes to protecting Mother Nature. First of all, the government is by no means capable of mitigating the matter of contaminated ecosystem without us - taxpayers. To his this one on the head, national budget is allocated to run multiple reforestation programmes as well as ameliorating natural habitat owing to taxes paid annually. Secondly, it is pragmatic for the public to have ample far-reaching impacts on the natural environment by replacing natural resources with sustainable and environmentally friendly energy ones. An illustration here is the growing establishment of the solar power system in the household, which has recently become a tendency in developing and developed countries.
Finally, huge companies also play a vital role in environmental preservation. They predominantly focus on minimizing the damage caused by their own industrial activities, from restricting exhaust fumes to relieving a relatively high proportion of hazardous substances dumped into the sea. However, it is possible for the local community to have a corresponding positive impact by means of refusing to use plastic bags or reducing personal vehicles. All in all, it can be concluded that the ecosystem is being improved tremendously by every member of society.
For these reasons, it is my personal belief that regardless of who we are, normal citizens or politicians, we always play an equal role in solving environmental pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | subodh | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | chioma49 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Mario Nese | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from. 73
- Computers are now the basis of the modern world. They should therefore be introduced into classrooms, and their programs used for direct teaching purposes.Argue both sides and give your opinion.Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant exampl 84
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animal from dying out, while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings.Discuss both views and give 89
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.ielts process diagram 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ere are three main reasons why it takes all of the community to tango when it comes to pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, well, as to, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39464882943 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26615472179 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678929765886 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5103197988 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.076923077 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0924064405961 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291964557573 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312205882501 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487426694468 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271077116621 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.