The Line Graph illustrates the level of consumption and production of Oil in China during the period of the year 1982 to the year 2006. At a glance, while during the early years the consume was highgher than the production, In the recently years, this trend has been reversed.
On the One Hand, the inner use of Oil, kept a plateau in 2 millons of barrels per day between 1982 and 1990. After that, had a dramaticall climb from that year to 2006 with more than 6 millions of oil barriels per day.
On the other hand, the level of consumption of oil , had an initial increase from 2 millon of barriers in 1982 to 3 million in 1986. Then, remained stable in that number until 1994. After that had an slighty climb to almost 3.5 millons in 2006.
All in All, in difference to 1982, and since around 1994, China has to find another way than the inner production to supply the demand of oil.
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 67
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 59
- In many countries today insufficient respect is shown to older people What do you think may be the reasons for this What problems might this cause in society 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... a glance, while during the early years the consume was highgher than the production, In th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...After that, had a dramaticall climb from that year to 2006 with more than 6 milli...
^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
... from that year to 2006 with more than 6 millions of oil barriels per day. On the other h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er hand, the level of consumption of oil , had an initial increase from 2 millon o...
^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ained stable in that number until 1994. After that had an slighty climb to almost 3.5...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... that number until 1994. After that had an slighty climb to almost 3.5 millons in ...
^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...6. All in All, in difference to 1982, and since around 1994, China has to find...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 729.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39156626506 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29373365907 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0027572411 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.125 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313943159771 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12692080076 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131454792825 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17149858057 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524193215542 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.