The advance of the capitalism and globalization is creating a new era of long hours at work. Due the increasing of the ambicious of employers and competition among the society, organizations are demanding more working hours to their employees. In my opinion, although this trend is creating some incredible results in the camp of new bussiness and technologies, there are some drawbacks as the rising of illnesses and the lose of some important values as family and friendship. For these reasons, this as a negative development.
On the one hand, some researchers are agreed that the stress at work is one of the main reasons for the increasing illnesses around the world. However, the time spended there is becoming longer than in the past. In spite of that this is not a directed relation, the trend of spending long hours at work is contributing to create a society full of problems as anciety, depression and, in extreme cases, cancer.
On the other hand, our daily schudle is limited. Therefore, spending more time at work always is going to quit hours to other things. Due this, the new system is able to affect our private relations such as family and friends. As a proof of that, a lot of phycologist argues that the lack of shared time in a couple is one of the main reasons of domestical arguments. Hence, the excess of job affects our relations too.
To conclude, for all the aforamentioned arguments, even the new era of long hours at work is developing great advances in some aspects of the society, the problems as illnesses and the lack of some important values, overwight the benefits.
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 67
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 73
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 73
- The chart below gives the information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rawbacks as the rising of illnesses and the lose of some important values as family and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun phycologist seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of phycologists'.
Suggestion: a lot of phycologists
...family and friends. As a proof of that, a lot of phycologist argues that the lack of shared time in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, so, therefore, such as, in my opinion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81588447653 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81478271513 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494584837545 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0467287654 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.615384615 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303849048678 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992964318851 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765578562394 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190439220955 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058475911085 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.