The line gram reveals information on the proportion of tourists visiting Brighton attractions in England during the period 1980-2010. Units are measured in percent (%).
Overall, the percentage of tourists who visited festival in 1980 was recorded to be the highest one, with 30%, whereas the corresponding figure given for pier was determined to be the lowest, with just 10%. The proportion of people visiting the pavilion and pier seemed to increased dramatically in the whole period while the figures for festival and art gallery tended to decreased.
In terms of pavilion, the figure grew gradually in the period 1980-1995 and reached its highest number of nearly 50% in 1995 then fell significantly to stay at 30% in 2010. The figure for pier, however, experienced a slightly growth and reached approximately 20% in 2010.
According to the graph, the figure given for art gallery skyrocketed in 1980-1985, from about 20% to almost 40%. Nevertheless, this figure suffered a huge fell in the last period, stood at just 10% in 2010, whereas the figure for festival decreased slightly in the whole period.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...e figure for pier, however, experienced a slightly growth and reached approximately 20% in 2010. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8192174332 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8139701239 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122564681512 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587335143452 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937097117837 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944015226438 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100477615757 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.