The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustrates, the information of Brighton tourist attractive places like art gallery, pavilion, pier and festival visitors in England from 1980 to 2010. Units are measured in percentage.

Overall, the proportion of visitors undergone some fluctuation in the period given. The most highest tourist attractive place in Brighton was pavilion. While, pier represents the lowest account of visitors in Brighton records.

In 1980, visitors of pavilion was approximately 23%. However,the following years account of pavilion visitors exceeded over festival and art gallery and dramatically increased to about 48% by 1995. There was a noticeable reduction of visitors in 2000 with around 35%. Then the graph remained slight decrease and finished to just above 30% in 2010. In comparison, about 21% of visitors came on art gallery at the beginning period and sharply surged to near 40% by 1985. After five years trend plummet to 20% and remained constant for one decade before falling at the bottom below 10% by 2010.

Regarding, the percentage of festival and pier visitors was 30% and 10% respectively in starting period. Festival visitors remained relatively stable with in between 25% to 30 % in the whole period given with mild fluctuation. Whereas, tourist of pier was undergone moderate oscillation up to 2000 and climbed over art gallery visitors in 2005. As is observed, the visitors of pier finished with more than 20% at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-14 Kien Vu 11 view
2020-01-14 Kien Vu 11 view
2020-01-14 Kien Vu 11 view
2019-12-22 Sagar Gurung 73 view
2019-11-02 Trần Thị Như Quỳnh 84 view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne graph illustrates, the information of Brighton tourist attractive places like ...
^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...me fluctuation in the period given. The most highest tourist attractive place in Brighton wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the highest'.
Suggestion: most the highest
...me fluctuation in the period given. The most highest tourist attractive place in Brighton wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ractive place in Brighton was pavilion. While, pier represents the lowest account of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... pavilion was approximately 23%. However,the following years account of pavilion vis...
^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s exceeded over festival and art gallery and dramatically increased to about 48% ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, so, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26923076923 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79132070067 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9059689261 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.93333333333 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904279026433 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346379726657 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552592970615 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822141966443 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648182573245 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.