The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton

The line chart illustrates the proportion of visitors to four destinations in Brighton, located in England over 30-year period, starting from 1980.

Overall, an slight increase was seen in the percentage of visitors arrived to both pavilion and pier, while the others experienced an opposite trend. In addition, gallery recorded the least percentage of tourists throughout the whole period.

As can be seen from the graph, in 1980 approximately 25% of tourists prefered to pavilion. Then, it rose considerably before reaching a peak of nearly 50% in 1995. Afterward, the figure plunged to just over 30% in 2010. regarding pier, there was a fuctuation between 10% and 15% from 1980 to 2005, which was followed by an upward trend to a high of about 23% in 2010.

The most popular tourist traps in Brithton in 1980 was Festival point, which was 30% in proportion of tourists entering. following this, there was a slight decline to 28% in 2010. In regard to Art gallery, starting at roughly 21% during the first year of the period, the percentage of visitors grew by 16% in 1985, but later went up to 20% in 1990, before hitting a lowest point of under 10% in 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-31 maiphuonganh 56 view
2023-08-31 maiphuonganh 11 view
2023-08-31 maiphuonganh 11 view
2023-06-19 ililmaidatuz 78 view
2023-06-19 ililmaidatuz 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 30-year period, starting from 1980. Overall, an slight increase was seen in ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d, starting from 1980. Overall, an slight increase was seen in the percent...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourists throughout the whole period. As can be seen from the graph, in 1980 a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Regarding
...igure plunged to just over 30% in 2010. regarding pier, there was a fuctuation between 10...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rend to a high of about 23% in 2010. The most popular tourist traps in Britht...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...30% in proportion of tourists entering. following this, there was a slight decline to 28%...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 365, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... went up to 20% in 1990, before hitting a lowest point of under 10% in 2010.
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, regarding, then, while, in addition, in regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8855721393 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64857978488 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1456000065 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122381307424 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481953274809 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522594219628 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839780582217 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449449747347 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.