The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line graph below summarizes the information about the percentage of tourists who visited four attractions in Brighton in 30 years time, from 1980 to 2010. Overall, it can be seen that the Pavillion is the one attraction among all which increased the most in the number of visitors over the years, as it started at just above 20% in 1980 and ended at 30% in 2010. During those years, the share of visitors rapidly increased to reach a peak of almost 50% in 1995, however, almost as fast, the share decreased to 35% in the next 5 years. The year 2010 saw a slow reduction in the percentage of tourists visiting the Pavillion, that went back to 30%.
On the contrary, the number of tourists visiting the Art Gallery over the years decreased steadily from 20% to just below 10% in 2010, with a high peak of 35% reached only in 1985. The festival's visitors remained always the same share, starting at around 30% and ending at 25%, but with a slight hollow in 1995.
Lastly, the Pier part of tourists followed a steady increase-decrease rate over the years, from 1880 to 1990, staying at around 10%. Then, the percentage remained above 10% until the years 2000, when it started to rise, reaching a peak of 20% of visitors in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below summarizes the information about ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'remained'.
Suggestion: always remained
...ed only in 1985. The festivals visitors remained always the same share, starting at around 30% ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 25%, but with a slight hollow in 1995. Lastly, the Pier part of tourists follow...
^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing a peak of 20% of visitors in 2010.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, lastly, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55405405405 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48720857122 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.1120304031 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.375 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187102710011 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100967688074 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148352398606 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119342178317 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857009772238 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.