The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the proportion of travelers who came to Scotland and visited 4 places in Edinburgh: aquarium, zoo, festival and castle, from 1980 to 2010.

Overall, the figure for tourists who visited aquarium, zoo and festival fluctuated over the period of 30 years. Meanwhile, the percentage of people going to the castle remained stable.

In 1980, there was about 24% of people who came to visit the castle. The figure increased significantly from that time on, then reached a peak of around 45% in 1995 before declining gradually and dropped to 30% in 2010. The percentage of tourists who visited aquarium rose rapidly from 20% to 25%, in 1980 and 1985 respectively. However, after 1980, there was sharp decrease in this figure, dropped to the lowest point at about 9% in 2010.

Meanwhile, the percentage of people going to the zoo fluctuated between 1980 and 2000, then increased dramatically to 20% in 2010. In the period from 1980 to 2010, there was a slight fall in the figure for castle's visitors by 2%, from 30% in 1980.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87150837989 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61725732237 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519553072626 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9930032993 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118945707846 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608478876372 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595869771801 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933426498086 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562971516545 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.