Nowadays, it has been observed that the issue of misbehaviour in society is raised; henceforth, fewer people remained, who reverence others. If pondered, there are numerous root causes behind such a change and several precautionary measures could be implemented to combat this issue. Both the aspects are discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Out of the possible reasons, some could be more responsible than others for the antisocial attitude of citizens. The most significant one is that most of the people changed their lifestyle as more of them started living in nuclear families. In a rush to avail privacy and freedom in life, younger people mentally live far away from elder people; although, physically they are living in the same house. Advise of old-aged people has been always fruitful for the modern youth as they have experienced a lot of unethical events in their life and seen the detrimental result of such behaviour. Apart from that, social pressure makes people more unrespected. By this I mean that, not only the materialistic lifestyle of individuals make them aggressive toward earning money but sometimes inequality of income also matters. Every citizen has a strong desire to live a tremendous life and earn the same amount of money their rich neighbour has.
Nonetheless, this problem could be tackled with a variety of corrective steps. Firstly, several moral lessons must be thought to the children at times of their upbringing, either by their parents or by educational institutes. As a consequence, the future generation would have the inherent ability to enjoy life with their aged parents. Secondly, the importance of money should decrease in lifestyle. In other words, the wrong combination of happiness and money by contemporary youth would be properly addressed by informing them about other ways of a joyful and fortunate life. One recent survey concluded that the happiness index of one state of India reached 3rd position from the 22nd within 10 years by adding moral science subject to their academic curriculum.
To conclude, Indeed, the social problem of respect for other people has been becoming more complex to solve as a result of altered lifestyle. Although it would possible by combinational efforts of government and literate citizen. I believe society is incomplete without respect toward each other.
- The bar chart below shows the sector contribution to India s gross domestic product from 1960to 2000 11
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'roots'?
Suggestion: roots
...others. If pondered, there are numerous root causes behind such a change and several...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...subject to their academic curriculum. To conclude, Indeed, the social problem ...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...without respect toward each other.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, apart from, i mean, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28191489362 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7921833595 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598404255319 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3148729935 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.526315789 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147824231238 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433852579094 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457373218928 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946329725535 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510155938264 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.