The line graph indicates the manufacture of paper, wood pulp and sawn wood in the United Kingdom between 1980 and 2000.
In general, the industry of paper and packaging started with 230 million tonnages in 1980 and this number is the highest in 1980. Respectively, sawn wood and wood pulp had various and lower amounts of productivity than paper creation.
In terms of marketing of paper and packaging escalated to 250 million tonnages in 1990 because of demands. When comes to 2000, the tons of trade increased dramatically to 350 million tonnages as a result of the types of labor that developed during these years. If we compare it with sawn wood, there was a decline in production after 1980.
The other changes involve sawn wood and wood pulp. In 1980, the business of sawn-wood commenced with 200 and in 1990 and 2000, there was a sharp decline in creation by 150 million tonnages in 1990 and then, 130 million tonnages in 2000. Wood pulp showcased 160 million tonnes of production in 1980. Thereon, the numbers are shown same the same results as the making of sawn wood in 1990. Finally, the production of wood pulp illustrated 140 million tonnages in 2000.
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 73
- The Chart Below shows the milk export figures from three European countries between 2008 and 2012 Task 1 essay a barchat 87
- School children are becoming far too dependent on computers This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills Teachers need to avoid using computers in classroom at all costs and go back to teaching study skills Do you agree or disagree 78
- The Chart Below shows the milk export figures from three European countries between 2008 and 2012 Task 1 essay a barchat 74
- Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81188118812 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48721857692 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3578194642 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3636363636 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469693658265 0.215688989381 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227462080414 0.103423049105 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143700592658 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.347957894293 0.15604864568 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128550230296 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.