The maps show the changes of Springfield primary school in 2005 – 2015.
The maps illustrate the alterations of Springfield primary school between 2005 and 2015. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the size of the educational institution which modified to be a larger school in 2015.
To begin with the east of the school, there was a new main entrance in between the main office and the new gym. To the north part of the gym, the existence of classroom 4, classroom 5, classroom 6 and the other new entrance had replaced the position of portable classrooms in 2005.
In accordance with the west side of the centre of learning, the classroom 1, classroom 2, classroom 3, toilet males and females, and the main office remained unchanged over the whole period. Nevertheless, there was the modification for the size and the position of library in 2005 in which it had been expanded and had been moved to the west of the classroom 1 and the new principal’s office, which replaced the place of library in 2005.
- The table shows the number of teaching schools in 2000, 2005 and 2009. 89
- Map : the changes of various facilities in the city between 2007 and 2010. 67
- The graph above shows the radio and television audience throughout the day in 1982. 78
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment. 73
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76023391813 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79615344007 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502923976608 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9635618977 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20973093823 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140200454576 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188928961221 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176424246299 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180124186825 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.