Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to an exchange of information. Far from being beneficial, this is a danger to our societies.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience>
Write at least 250 words.
The advent of new technology has made faster and easier in the ways people access to information. As a consequence, it is argued that modern technology gets the drawback to exceed its advantage. While I agree that the disadvantage is much, I believe that are still beneficial in other aspects.
On the one hand, the assistance of technological devices like mobile phone, tablet make us gain information easier. Teacher, researchers and people of all ages can receive a huge knowledge and even more, they can store and retain these data for the future. For instance, to become a well-known person, users who might obtain numerous lessons, skills and so on by the new technology. By accessing huge storage knowledge and retain it, modern technology reveals us the potential and power towards the enhancement of development.
On the other hand, people who might misuse the accessible data and do harm to others. Users have to offer their information to join websites and as a consequence, the risk is rising. Namely, hacker the one might steal your private information to sell it. Moreover, they can also hack the top data of the government to prepare for their crime. In other words, terrorism takes more chances to reach some vital news of policy and to practice their criminal plans aim to dominate. For instance, there is an array of unsecured in the online account, like Facebook. The private information of users is leakage. The noteworthy is that this case is no rarely in few recent decades. This is the most crucial problem of the newest technology.
In conclusion, although modern technology raises the risk for society, we still can not dismiss its assistance in obtaining countless knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | fachryadul92 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | fachryadul92 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | fachryadul92 | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Unstopable | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-18 | Adler | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 78
- The line graph compares three companies in terms of their waste output between the years 2000 and 2015. 61
- As well as making money, businessesalso have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01056338028 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78509107484 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5385502616 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.7058823529 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119994692631 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370668090629 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264000491961 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766590729881 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171401543641 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.