the line graph shows the amount of money spend on books in Germany Italia France and Italia between 1989 and 2005

Essay topics:

the line graph shows the amount of money spend on books in Germany, Italia, France and Italia between 1989 and 2005

The line graph compares how much of expenditure was used on books by readers who were from four distinct countries: Germany, France, Italia and Australia from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that Germany expended more budget on books than three remainder countries. Moreover, these was similarly increase trend on the figure of all four nations.
In 1995, Australia had lowest cost which was used to buy books with only 30 millions USD. Despite this cost maintained from 1995 to 2001, this figure rose dramatically and finished at above 70 millions USD at the end of period. These was a fluctuation slightly of the amount of money buying books between 50 and 60 millions USD over first 4-year period. Although that, this figure rose by more than 10 millions USD in 2005.
Another interesting point is that despite slightly fluctuation, the amount of money spend on books by Germany consumer always was larger than three others during this research period. And expenditure rose peak of almost 100 millions at the end of the period. In Italia, the spending on book witnessed a gradual increase. This statistic reached a final figure of just over 60 milions in 2005

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-08-23 anhnatss123 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...ountries. Moreover, these was similarly increase trend on the figure of all four nations...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...f all four nations. In 1995, Australia had lowest cost which was used to buy books with o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
...e 70 millions USD at the end of period. These was a fluctuation slightly of the amoun...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, similarly

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91919191919 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47726114352 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580808080808 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0295197096 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218598771749 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855512079606 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842345971976 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135234630645 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676336877545 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.