the line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited to four diferent attractions in Brighton
The line graph compares the amount of four different types of food which were European nation consumed between 1979 and 2004.
Overall, it is clear that Fish was the lowest food product was used by European contomer throughout the reserch period. Moreover, the expenditure on Beef, Lamb decreased, while the there was fluctuating increase in the figure for chicken.
It can be seen that in 1979, Beef was Eropean consumer chose as the most priority food with around 220 grams per person per week and reached a peak at about 240 grams in 1983. However, this figure declined fluctuating at 100 grams in the end research period. Similarly to Beef demand, there was a decrease considerable for the figure of Lamb from 150 grams in 1979 per person per week to approximate 60 grams in the latest preiod.
In the preiod between 1979 and 2004, the country witnessed a significant growth from just under 150 grams to just over 250 grams per person per day in the consumsion of chicken. The expenditure of fishs was contradictory with three type of remainder food. This figure of fishs almost remained steady at just under 50 grams until the finish period, before it declined minimaly by 10 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-22 | anhnatss123 | 56 | view |
- the line graphs show the differentce on income in five country between 1978 and 2008 73
- the graph shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables suger and sweets and cabonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 in US 78
- the graph shows the consumtion of fish and some diferent kinds of meat in a Eropean country between 1979 and 2004 11
- the line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited to four diferent attractions in Brighton 56
- the line graph shows the amount of money spend on books in Germany Italia France and Italia between 1989 and 2005 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was used by European contomer throughout the reserch period. Moreover, the expend...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...t 100 grams in the end research period. Similarly to Beef demand, there was a decrease co...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81951219512 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4684565645 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4268503877 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0241648231986 0.215688989381 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0136550272882 0.103423049105 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038622249571 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0307238113983 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532152023441 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.