The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004

The line graphs below provides information about the bananas cost in US dollar per KG in 4 different countries(Japan, France, Germany and USA) between 1996 and 2004.

Looking from overall perspective, it is readily apparent that banana price in US dollars per KG in Japan was very high. While, USA maintained banana cost remained steady. Banana prices fluctuated in Japan, France and Germany countries throughout the period.

At the beginning of period, banana price were at $2 per kg in both Japan and France countries. However, cost in Japan increased drastically reaching around $3 in 1998 and hitting high point. Whereas, selling cost of banana remained study till 1998 in France and declined to 1.5 dollar in 1999 and after that, banana price fluctuated in both countries. 2.5 and 2 dollars were banana prices respectively, at the end of period.

Banana rate in Germany was high compared to USA in 1996 and figures for price at 1.5 and 1 dollar correspondingly. Although, after having banana price ups and downs till 1999 then price increased significantly to $2 in 2002, ended with around $1.75 price. On the other hand, apart from slight growth in 1998 of price approximately $0.25, In comparison to $1 with previous year, it remained steady over an 8 years period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... dollars per KG in Japan was very high. While, USA maintained banana cost remained st...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eginning of period, banana price were at per kg in both Japan and France countrie...
^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an increased drastically reaching around in 1998 and hitting high point. Whereas,...
^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...99 then price increased significantly to in 2002, ended with around .75 price. On...
^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce approximately sh.25, In comparison to with previous year, it remained steady o...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, whereas, while, apart from, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05741626794 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7425409934 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7974127729 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0909090909 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17184546834 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754955564698 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555185893461 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128485595412 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059951985894 0.0819641961636 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.