The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
The line graph compares the number of visitors who visited Caryl Island in the period of eight years, from 2000 to 2008 with the data given in two yearly increments.
Overall, the number of visitors to the island divided into two categories: first time visitors and returning visitors, increased significantly over the period given.
In 200, the amount of first time visitors was approximately 8000 per year, compared with only about 3000 visitors who came back the destination. By contrast, in 2002, that trend reversed with 10000 returning visitors, higher than 4000 visitors for the first time.
Between 2002 and 2006, there was a dramatic increase in both categories. The figure of returning visitors reached the peak at more than 14000 and the combined total of visitors was at about 24000 people. In 2008, while the number of people who visited for the first time grow continually, those who coming Caryl Island for additional visits fell down and finished at more than 13000 visitors each year.
- Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits, and TV channels.Do the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages? 67
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subjects.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Home schooling belongs to the past and is unacceptable in the modern society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- In recent years there has been growing interest in relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high level of personal achievement are possible on 82
- The graph shows changes of amount and type of fast food consumed by teenagers in Australia from 1975 to 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09036144578 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47023946833 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4498303857 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535482828716 0.215688989381 248% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236833546875 0.103423049105 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137846772173 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337826424975 0.15604864568 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745510496861 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.