The line graph shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
The line graph illustrates the quantity of oil barrels produced and consumed daily in China from 1982 to 2006.
It can be seen from the graph that the overall trend was upward. While the consumption of oil was slightly lower than the production in the first few years of the period, it rose to the top of the graph at the end.
In 1982, the figure for the number of oil barrels used was slightly under 2 million a day. This continued to see no change between 1982 and 1990 at just around 2 millions of oil barrels per day. From 1990 to 2006, there was an exponential increase in the oil consumption to over 6 millions of oil barrels used on a daily basis at the end of the period.
Moving on to the number of barrels of oil manufactured, there was a significant rise from 2 to 3 millions of oil barrels produced each day from 1982 to 1986. Oil production then experienced a progressively rise to approximately 3,5 million barrels a day between the period of 20 years from 1986 to 2006
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-17 | zee7 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | Wisnu Legowo | view | |
| 2023-02-18 | Wisnu Legowo | view | |
| 2022-06-27 | Kiwi | view | |
| 2022-06-27 | Kiwi | 100 | view |
- The line graph shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at l 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both view 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...ge between 1982 and 1990 at just around 2 millions of oil barrels per day. From 1990 to 2006,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...increase in the oil consumption to over 6 millions of oil barrels used on a daily basis at th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
... there was a significant rise from 2 to 3 millions of oil barrels produced each day from 1982...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('progressively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...o 1986. Oil production then experienced a progressively rise to approximately 3,5 million barrels a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lion barrels a day between the period of 20 years from 1986 to 2006
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.35135135135 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59045841486 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7888605322 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.625 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326564600271 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162137731852 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859059977998 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226441283966 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784390223602 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.