The supplied line graph illustrates amount of stolen vehicles, counted in thefts per thousands vehicles in Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada over the period of nine years, from 1990 to 1999. It could be noticed that all countries presented downward trend over 9 years, while it can be clearly seen that Sweden showed opposite upward tendency. At the onset, Great Britain has the highest figure of stolen cars than any other country.
As shown in the graph, thefts in Britain had stolen the most vehicles in comparison to other countries. In 1992 and 1996 number of theft cars have been peaking in UK to almost twenty thefts per thousand cars. However, as France and Canada, UK ended up with lower number of stolen cars, when in 1990 was about 18 thefts per 1000 cars, in 1999 number of stolen cars dropped to nearly 16.5 thefts per 1000 vehicles.
Getting back to the details, France and Canada had similar oscillated effect of about 8 and 7 thefts per thousand cars at the beginning of the period, when finished together close to 6 thefts per 1000 motor vehicles.
From the other hand, number of theft cars in Sweden, sharply rose from 8 in 1990 to nearly 15 in 1999. Difference between France and Canada was at the end of nine years period about 9 stolen cars per thousand.
- Most people believe that stricter punishment should be given for traffic offences. To what extent do you agree ? 84
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries 95
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 89
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should begin learning a foreign language as soon as they start school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69162995595 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22360073769 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528634361233 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2672600741 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214234884612 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100899714615 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054983480381 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138316733057 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249150722925 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.