Living in a country when you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Living in a country when you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that there would be not only social but also practical issues caused by living abroad. While I think that several unexpected misunderstandings might lead to severe social challenges for foreigners, I hold a firm belief that technology breakthoughs can help them manage to live conveniently.

The main reasons for social problems could be culture and language barriers. Obviously, foreigners who are not able to speak native languages of countries they travel to seemingly find it difficult to exchange information, especially in some countries that English is unpopular. Even though body language is probably used, misinterpretation could cause numerous undesirable situations. Also, some people might even feel offended because of culture differences. For example, while in America or Western countries, shaking hands when meeting business partners is usually meant as a warm welcome, it is considered as an aggressive sign in The Phillipines. Therefore, residents from overseas countries appear to fail to communicate effectively, and it’s possible they be isolated among community as a result.

However, with the development of technology and popularity of English, practical problems for people living overseas can be tackled quickly. The first example worth mentioning is searching for directions. With some basic English and a smartphone connected to the internet, finding ways within any city on the world has never been easier. Besides, online shopping has become increasingly prevalent that goods from food to furniture can be effortlessly ordered on websites such as Foodpanda and Amazon. Furthermore, nowadays, locations are less important for work choices because people can choose to work from home.

In conclusion, although I agree that differences in languages and cultures can bring about a variety of disadvantages, I believe that people could take advantages of advanced technology to ease the difficulties when living in a foreign country.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-02-21 pateldhruv1708 73 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 965.302439024 175% => OK
No of words: 298.0 196.424390244 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6711409396 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13772565448 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 106.607317073 182% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651006711409 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 283.868780488 186% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3572862878 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170590442626 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054502490022 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476389228395 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107647592471 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322224711679 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 40.7170731707 248% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.