In recent times one of the most debated issues relates to ability to speak foreign language. Some assert that inability to understand foreign language ought to lead not only social problems but also create some practical problems.
On the one side of the argument there are people who reason that speaking a language other than person's mother tongue may lead to some worth-considering social problems. First and foremost, if an immigrant living overseas is incapable of speaking widely-used in a country, he is likely to face troubles to settle himself into the new environment. Apart from that, he may find difficulties to deal with daily simple activities. For instance, people may have problems while talking with neighbors or contacting bank or governments, who only understand local foreign language. The second point in this context is that the lack of foreign language ability may possibly result in misunderstanding of laws and instruction. There might be a high chances to violate local regulations because of their illiteracy, they cannot read and understand the instruction to follow the rules.
On the other hand, the other group believes that there are the higher chances of having practical problems related to language barriers. According to them, poor verbal and written communication in foreign language may be the main cause of high employment among immigrants. A vast majority of foreign immigrants cannot apply high-paid and white collar job since most of the jobs require language competence. Further, illiteracy and misunderstanding may lead to health problems, such as stress and depression. Many times, they feel fear, while communicating with local people due to that they might have not only health issues but also disturb their mental ability.
To conclude, to adapt new environment well, immigrants should able to communicate well in the language spoken in their localities. Lack of having less knowledge about foreign language may cause multiple troubles to any person living in that country. Therefore, it should be advisable to learn foreign language before relocate to that country.
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 84
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 61
- The Diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- People living in 21st century generally have better quality life than people born in earlier centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...at the lack of foreign language ability may possibly result in misunderstanding of laws and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...at the lack of foreign language ability may possibly result in misunderstanding of laws and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 1.00243902439 1397% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 965.302439024 186% => OK
No of words: 333.0 196.424390244 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37837837838 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88465598626 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 106.607317073 174% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558558558559 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 283.868780488 194% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3564434823 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.9375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206783841312 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685448779267 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050310375531 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14094144779 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248500634644 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 40.7170731707 204% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.