The maps illustrates the transformation of a town called Harborne between 1963 and 2007.
In general, the town became more developed, cutting out some of the natural beauty while extending the residential area and providing more options for shopping and leisures activities.
From 1963 to 2007, the area around the river was developed into a residential area in the northeastern part of the city. The number of trees located in the northwest was dropped significantly in the 71 year period.
In the center of the town, they built a new shopping centre, and the post office, bank and library remained. The sweet shop and butchers were replaced with a supermarket. Across the post office, there was built a new travel agent, right beside the banks, where the flower shop used to be. The bike path in the southwest was redesigned as a road. In the southeast, the government offices was converted into a museum, and the adjacent farmland was turned into a golf course.
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children. 78
- The percentage of school-aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010 78
- Look at the maps below showing how the town of Harborne changes from 1936 to 2007, and summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. Make comparison where relevant. 11
- A survey conducted for the places in which people gain access to the Internet from 1998 to 2004 62
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The maps illustrates the transformation of a town called Har...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 57, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...town became more developed, cutting out some of the natural beauty while extending the resi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96341463415 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72191734396 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2443695074 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4444444444 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0785769050131 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345168329684 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516501587953 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651572806441 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614359387441 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.