Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the two maps delineating the renovation of a campus over a course of time, since 1995. Perceptibly, the accommodation has experienced drastic modifications with the myriad of improvements and replacements.
Before the transition, there was a sport area in the left-hand corner with a football pitch, tennis courts and gym. Meanwhile, there was a Founder's building in the middle of the campus, which was between the students' union and the Scott library. Additionally, there was a bus stop to the northwest of the students' union. Moreover, there were a Watson building and café in front of and behind the Founder's building in sequence. Especially, the main reception was part of the Watson building. Likewise, there were two carparks in the top left corner and right-side. Overall, the campus wasn't used entirely with various clusters of trees surrounded.
After being transformed, the Watson building and Founder's building has stayed unchanged but the expansion of the former and the addition of the café to the latter. The two car park have been replaced by the main reception and the table tennis tables respectively which are reduced to one place and removed to the east. The green area on the left-hand side now has been devoted for the two halls of residence. In the top right-hand corner, there is a students' union which is between the sport area and bus stop on its left and right in sequence. Furthermore, there is Scott library behind the students' union. Behind the Founder's building, there are laboratories between the arts buildings and recreation area. In the bottom of the campus, there is another café surrounded by myriad clusters of trees and next to the pond on its right.
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1955 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- the chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2015 and 2015 67
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Look at the two maps of Sunnyhills University campus in 1995 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the renovation...
^^^
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ner and right-side. Overall, the campus wasnt used entirely with various clusters of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are a students'?
Suggestion: there are a students
...esidence. In the top right-hand corner, there is a students union which is between the sport area a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01408450704 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78447890159 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468309859155 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1879528952 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1875 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0758298236226 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276880915279 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403034246855 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680880466641 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336172353386 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.