Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progresses are equally important for a country.
How should a government prioritize any sector entailing development? This question is quiet relevant in present scenario. Many governments in the world, elucidating about how economy has helped human being, opt economic progress as their top priority; however, some of their counterparts believe that all fields entailing progress must be addressed in order to stand out against their competitor. I mostly believe with later groups of establishments because of the reason that our advancements hinges upon all the sector of development along with economy.
Admittedly, the people who are in favor of economic progress justify their argument with the reason that world, as engineered and advanced as we see today, is literally run by economy. Thanks to system of economy, not only did we, being a human species, dominated entire world with our new discoveries and innovations, we also made our life easier. Free market and privatization, for instance, made our daily basic needs (food, shelter and security) abundant and cheap which, before farming era begun, had to be acquired through taxing efforts. This is why most government spend most of the resources in economic development.
However, governments should not categorically prioritize economy as their first priority in term of investing or funding as there are other field which requires help from the government. Should government trivialize other sector, further advancement of human species in this world will not be possible. To illustrate, even though some of financially unfeasible research projects, such as space exploration, colonization of mars or moon and development of galactic empire, seems far-fetched, government must continue on funding these projects as these expeditions help proliferating progress of human species. Moreover, spending only in economic progress will not be sustainable if other sector is taken for granted. For example, it is fallacious to assume that without funding and prioritizing education government will continue on pilling up the wealth. To sum up, all the sector of development should be equally treated for long term development of nation.
To conclude, while many establishments put economic progress as top priority citing aforementioned reasons, I, however, contend that each and every sector should be equally developed in order to have an edge over other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or of development along with economy. Admittedly, the people who are in favor ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...investing or funding as there are other field which requires help from the government...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 569, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to proliferate' or 'proliferate'.
Suggestion: to proliferate; proliferate
...hese projects as these expeditions help proliferating progress of human species. Moreover, sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r long term development of nation. To conclude, while many establishments p...
^^^^
Line 15, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in order to have an edge over other.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 3.97073170732 504% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 965.302439024 209% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 363.0 196.424390244 185% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5564738292 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00538969998 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 106.607317073 201% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589531680441 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 283.868780488 220% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.6394287129 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.466666667 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232042131646 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803451287661 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648748204619 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149806372187 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301478640434 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 40.7170731707 246% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.