The maps below show the town of Honeybourne in 1990 and today.
The two maps are juxtaposed to show how Honeybourne, a small town, changed from the start of 20th century to present time.
Overall, aforementioned town witnessed dramatic changes during this period in terms of natural and artificial entities. Most of the natural aspects of the town, such as forest, river and farmlands, have significantly declined; while, man-made structures, such as roads, buildings and facilities, have proliferated during this time.
During the first establishment in 1900, the settlements, infrastructures and agricultural lands were mostly sorrounded by forests which along with river have witnessed negative effect of urbanization. Furthermore, the oval shaped town center and establishment-- whose size have increased presently-- existed at the center sorrounding the farmlands, which, presently, is exterminated entirely for providing space for further settlement. The number of schools have increased while, intrestingly, number of church remained same (one only) comparing both the maps; moreover, new settlements, which was absent previously, have been formed at eastern side of outskirt of the town. The town which was connected by a curved highway parallel to the river with a bridge near the town center has made improvement in transportation sector as number of bridge have increased ,and a new railway station has been constructed, while road alignment remained same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 860, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ector as number of bridge have increased ,and a new railway station has been const...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74162679426 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19240244116 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.787943418 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.428571429 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109482194198 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583812311929 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517973133001 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970475189451 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557080854068 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.2329268293 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.