Some People Say That The Best Way To Improve Public Health Is By Increasing The Number Of Sports Facilities
Amidst unhealthy lifestyle of today's generation, a question is always put forward for the debate: how can a government allay unhealthy living of their citizens? Some people suggest that sports facilites are the best way to assist people to be healthy; however, others, giving various logical reasons, contend that sports facilities will prove to be superfluous and other options should be implemented. I, personally, believe that both sides of view must be carefully analysed and all the options must be taken into account while formulation of the plan.
People, who believe that proliferation of sports facilities such as increase in sports stadiums does not have significant improvement in public health, cite various reasons to justify their arguments. One of the arguments is that people may not join these facilities which may result in wastage of investment by the authority. It could be possible that people might not partake physical activities in these facilities because of various reasons such as busy schedule, lack of information regarding those facilities and laziness. These people, instead, purpose various reforms to alleviate ongoing problems of unhealthy lifestyle: implementation of strict laws regarding processed foods, awareness programmes such as seminars and workshops. These arguments do hold water to some extent.
On the other hand, most of the sports enthusiasts claim that improvement in sports facilites can improve the public health because sports prompt people to move their body thereby improving physical, mental and emotional health. Many research, which focus on effects of physical movement on various aspects of body, are present as evidences that shows not only does body movement during exercises improve cognitive capability of people but it also helps people coping stress in their hectic work life. Moreover, sports and exercises help people to be lean and healthy, and prevent from many unhealthy conditions and diseases which may occur due to overweight body. Given various evidences supporting positive effects of physical activities, claims made by advocates of sports seems to be warranted.
In conclusion, after juxtaposing both sides of view, I believe that, in addition to sports facilities, other reforms-- such as imposition of strict rules, awareness programs-- should be initiated by the incumbent entitiy so that public health is improved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the debate: how can a government allay unhealthy living of their citizens? Some...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccount while formulation of the plan. People, who believe that proliferation o...
^^^^
Line 9, column 229, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: Much research; A good deal of research
... physical, mental and emotional health. Many research, which focus on effects of physical mov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58038147139 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78158264279 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569482288828 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.79986345 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.538461538 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313029380291 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102126112623 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986838132448 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166758352258 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539691009018 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.