Many people today used their phones to communicate by sending text messages than talking. What are the reasons for this? Does it have advantages/disadvantages?
In today's world it can be seen that number of people are connected through messages instead of calling. I, however, believe that owing to number of reason people are habitual of sending text messages whereas, it has number of cons and pros as well of texting.
I would like to outline the advantages of sending text messages that eventually is far beneficial for those people who has busy job schedule at their workplace, as well as military people are not allowed to attend outside calls owing to security purpose. Moreover, number of people is doing outdoor jobs namely; delivery boy, purchase officer and many others that actually is not suitable for them to attend calls every time that's why they prefer to send messages. Additionally, people may text to those people who not attending calls due to busy schedule or mobile number is switched off.
On the other hand, the rising core disadvantage of sending text messages is that mostly youngsters has been addicted of using text messages that ultimately ruin their time and energy. Along with this, some people use cell phones every time due messages whether they are alone or sitting in any gathering which is also unethical. Furthermore, many people are connected with texting during bike riding or car riding that ultimately can be a caused of accident.
To sum up, people must be aware of disadvantages of excessive sending text messages but, not to overlook it's benefits as well. And, parents should look an eye on their children as well as guide them pertaining to adverse consequences of text messages.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-06-27 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 84 | view |
- Fast food is a part of life in many places. Some people think this has bad effects in lifestyle and diet. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons. 73
- Economic growth is only one key factor for ending world poverty problem, however someone says it leads towards a environment damaging and should be stopped. Discuss both of these views and give you own opinion. 84
- Scientist has been warning for many years about the importance of protecting the environment and that we must limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warnings, many people do not do this, what are the reasons for that and how people can be enc 78
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 63
- The Table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ble for them to attend calls every time thats why they prefer to send messages. Addit...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... adverse consequences of text messages.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, look, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96590909091 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52187115786 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57196969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4577327357 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.1 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3 5.23603664747 235% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334797076354 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131967140254 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508728149342 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192883529871 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397682082286 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.