The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now.
The map given illustrates the modernization of the layout of Riverage college over a period of 30 years.
It is evident from the map that the college has undergone some significant transformations, with the most typical one being the constructions of some amenities. Additionally, a Sport Hall has remained unchanged over time.
To the west of the college, there was a Sport Hall and a terrace, whose locations have not experienced any changes currently, accompanied by the conversion of the flower situated adjacent to the Hall into steps. Meanwhile, in the middle of the college, a library was flanked by a refectory to the north and a common room to the south 30 years ago. Up to now, there have been the substitutions of an office and a café for the refectory and the common room respectively, whereas the library still existed at the same position where it used to be.
In the eastern area, four offices located to the north of a reception has been demolised to make way for the erection of an art-class room. Likewise, the reception has unchanged, compared to the introduction of a music room to the south of it. In addition, a tree has been planted at the position where a car park used to be.
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Governments should ban dangerous sports Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- The diagram below shows how the orange juice is produced 73
- The graph below show that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 89
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, still, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70283018868 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94754711546 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9786475141 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139977219649 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535697034263 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702866483568 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930234518877 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774320773147 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.