The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now.
The map given illustrates the modernization of the layout of Riverage college over a period of 30 years.
It is evident from the map that the college has underwent some significant transformations, with the most typical one is the constructions of some amenities. Additionally, a Sport Hall remains unchanged over time.
To the west of the college, there was a Sport Hall and a terrace, whose locations have not experienced any changes currently, accompanied by the conversion of the flower situated adjacent to the Hall into steps. Meanwhile, in the middle of the college, a library was flanked by a refectory to the north and a common room to the south 30 years ago. Up to now, there are the substitutions of an office and a café for the refectory and the common room respectively, whereas the library still existed at the same position where it used to be.
In the eastern area, an art-class room has been erected, which is relative to the disappearance of four offices located to the north of a reception 30 years ago. Likewise, while the reception remains unchanged, to the south of it, there is an introduction of a music room, compared to the replacement of a tree for a car park.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'undergone'.
Suggestion: undergone
...ident from the map that the college has underwent some significant transformations, with ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74038461538 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03308616534 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543269230769 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1972672352 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186617667998 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747224310164 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694414534674 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112456742919 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594709820873 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.