The map below shows the development of the village of Rye mouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The map below shows the development of the village of Rye mouth between 1995 and present.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The map illustrates the changes in the Ryemouth village from 1995 to current time. Overall, it is obvious that Ryemouth village witnessed dramatic changes over the time period.

In the 1995 the north-east side of region was farmland and farmland was surrounded by forest park. There were huge fishing port and fish market in the south side which were completely removed. Housing area was located on each side of road. In separate sides of south road cafe and hotel were situated oppositely for visitors.

Observation of the blueprint reveals that the farmland disappeared and to be converted into a golf course. Forest Park in the vicinity of farmland was cut-downed and new tennis court was established. Fishing port was demolished as well as a fish market on the seaside was replaced by apartments. 133 Hotel modernized and car park was set up next to hotel. Main road from the south to the north-west was extended to the left direction. New houses were added to the housing zone, additionally shops which was located over against to fish market were transformed into restaurants.

Votes
Average: 1.4 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-05 Lily Ha 56 view
2023-04-08 Giang Tran 56 view
2023-01-14 nle2006 61 view
2023-01-14 nle2006 56 view
2022-08-31 Fara Has 90 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02762430939 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66226119823 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7136461675 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.8333333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0833333333 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0384588713598 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0193474007054 0.103423049105 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361538342617 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.039731245173 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397981739742 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.