The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided map illustrate plan for two possible sites for school construction in Canterbury.
A glance at the map reveals that the first proposed site is in the rural area of the town, while the second one is located in the town centre.
As presented in the map, the proposed site S1 is on the housing edge of the town, far from the town centre. In contrast, the second possible site is in the town centre, near the housing area. A similarity of both sites is that they are far from the university.
In terms of accessibility by road, the first possible site is next to the main road leading to Sturry with the population of 7000 people. A quite different picture can be seen for the proposed site S2 as there is no traffic zone in the area. It is 7km far from the Chartham, population of which is 4500 people.
- The maps below show Pancha Village in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The charts show information about the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The bar chart below shows the average duration of housework women did unemployed part time employed and full time when compared to men who had full time work in the UK between 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 91
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for school construction in Canterbury. A glance at the map reveals that the fir...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 672.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42105263158 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47028742145 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.371149008 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295726389844 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131539720239 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117052413533 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205099101652 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120543136856 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.