The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
The map shows two potential locations for a new supermarket in the town of Garlsdon.
We can see that the main difference between the proposed sites is that the first site (S1) is in the countryside, while the second site (S2) is in the heart of the town centre. Additionally, the crucial transport system for both supermarket locations is a railway.
According to the map, S1 is outside in the town to the northwest of Garlsdon, but this site is within easy reach of the housing zone. Meanwhile, S2 is also surrounded by the residential area and the industrial area, which is located in the town center.
There are three main roads from Bransdon, Cransdon and Hindon to Garlsdon town centre. However, there is a central no traffic zone, this is unable to reach S2 by car. By contrast, the position of S1 can allow accommodating a lot of cars. Both supermarket sites are near the railway which links between Hindon and Cransdon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | habeeb omran | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | andrew123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mirandajose | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | David Shahi | 84 | view |
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school. 73
- The graph shows weekly expenditure on fast food in Britain by food and income group 81
- The graph shows weekly expenditure on fast food in Britain by food and income group. 56
- Expenditure on fast foods by income groups,UK 1990 67
- Expenditure on fast foods by income groups,UK 1990 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70552147239 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75008169003 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2627258039 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2222222222 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375904255461 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157343315182 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187638957199 0.0843802449381 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288062623387 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.215932676506 0.0819641961636 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.